Welcome to TheOhioOutdoors
Wanting to join the rest of our members? Login or sign up today!
Login / Join

Army to switch pistols

Huckleberry Finn

Senior Member
15,973
135
The Army wants to retire its supply of 9mm handguns and replace it with a more accurate and user-friendly model that also will provide soldiers with more “knock-down” power.

Army officials say their inventory of more than 200,000 semi-automatic Beretta M9 and Sig Sauer M11 pistols has become outdated, worn out and needs to be replaced with an updated model that also offers more reliability and durability.

They also are considering new ammunition, which has sparked considerable debate among military and civilian weapon experts as well.

“Advancements in firearms have taken place since the M9 was adopted nearly 30 years ago, and it is our intent to take advantage of these advancements,” a military spokesperson told FoxNews.com on Friday. “The Army is seeking to replace the M9 and M11 pistols with a handgun that is more accurate, ergonomic, reliable and durable than the current pistol.”

Officials seem opposed to an update version of the Beretta M9, despite the company offering to make changes.

"We have submitted numerous changes or product improvements that really address a lot of the shortcomings that are either perceived or real," Beretta development manager Gabe Bailey recently told Military.com.

The Army has been considering a change for several years and on July 29 will hold a so-called “industry day” to brief gun manufacturers about the competition requirements for a winning proposal.

The Defense Department will reportedly buy more than 400,000 new pistols if and when officials agree on a new model.

Beyond the 9mm’s durability issue, which Army officials says is costing them too much in repairs, soldiers also say the pistol needs a more ergonomic grip, its safety device too often locks inadvertently and its open-slide bullet chamber allows in too much dirty, which results in jamming.

Still, a large issue appears to be about the caliber of the new ammunition, considering most experts argue a person must be hit with several 9 mm rounds to be killed.

“We are not dictating a caliber during the competition,” the spokesperson said. “A vendor may submit multiple calibers of ammunition. However, the ammunition must exceed the performance of the current M882 9mm round.”

Among those likely to be considered in the Modular Handgun System competition are the .40 and .45 caliber rounds.

The argument against the .40 caliber round is that its heavier weight and stronger recoil causes excessive wear on a 9 mm pistol.

There have been no reports on how much the new weapons will cost, amid budget concerns. However, in September 2012, Beretta received a 5-year, $64 million firm-fixed-price contract for up to 100,000 of its M9 9mm pistols, according to Defense Industry Daily.

Following industry day, the Army will release a draft Request for Proposal, which seeks input from manufacturers.

The Army will then consider the manufacturers’ comments and modify the request, if necessary. It will then hold a final industry day before issuing a final proposal before the end of the year.

The next phase will essentially be a tryout and elimination process, which officials say will be based on technical results and will rely “heavily” on soldier feedback.

“One of the primary requirements for this weapon system is to provide the soldier with increased terminal performance,” the spokesperson said. “Feedback from soldiers in the field is that they want increased ‘knock-down power.’ And the MHS program will evaluate commercially available weapons that meet that requirement.”

Sounds like ammo just got down $14.99 a box and now it'll go back up...

What do you think they will switch to, 1911's in .45? (There's nothing new under the sun) Or Glocks and M&P's in .40 or .45.
 

Jackalope

Dignitary Member
Staff member
38,859
260
Glad they're doing it. The Barrette M9 is a pile of shit better suited as a club. They need to go back to a .45 for CQB reasons. The 1911 should be out simply due to maintenance, capacity, and finickyness. But hell. The M16 has been finicky since Vietnam and they haven't really changed the platform. Hate to say it but they'll likely settle on Glock. Nothing wrong with them for a service weapon. Reliable. Not finicky. And just plain go boom. Ugly as sin but winning wars isn't about being good looking.
 

MK111

"Happy Hunting Grounds in the Sky"
Supporting Member
6,551
66
SW Ohio
I can't ever see the Glock being excepted with all the accidental discharges.
 

Jackalope

Dignitary Member
Staff member
38,859
260
I can't ever see the Glock being excepted with all the accidental discharges.

Glock would have to overcome the lack of a positive safety. Something that's been an arms requirement in the past. They're also not a big fan of polymer frames and slides. The Mossberg and Remington shotguns the army bought are required to have an all metal trigger group.

When the ATF had their gun competition for their new arms the Smith had almost double the failures that the Glock did. But the smith barely won out in the end.
 

Beentown

Dignitary Member
Supporting Member
15,740
154
Sunbury, OH
Nothing will come of it. This gets stirred every now and then. The Beretta won the trials followed closely by Sig. The investment is too large for a weapon that rarely gets used. If you are using a pistol it is to get back to your rifle or your doing it wrong.
 
I doubt the .40 and .357 sig chambered pistols will live up to the high round counts like a 9mm or .45 acp will. I doubt a polymer frame will hold up to the decade of carry abuse, weekly scrubbing and extremely high service life round counts like a metal frame will. A lot of the m9 in the armory have the frame finish worn down to bare aluminum. Besides the army just ordered half a million m9s in 2008. They should have changed then if there was a need. The only compliant I have with the m9 is the location of the safety/decocker. The m9 beat the sig p226 in package cost. If they want a better service pistol look no farther than the one they turned down 30 years ago.
 
Last edited: